nemecko,nacizmus,totalita,zid

istrokapital,

In 2008, the Spanish government, under pressure from the eurozone to
cut its budget during the financial crisis, began to reverse generous
subsidies for solar energy. Spain reduced support for solar in stages.
It changed the definition of its main solar incentive program in 2008,
reduced the subsidies through two measures in 2010, placed a moratorium
on subsidies for new solar plants in 2011, and added further
restrictions in 2013.

Renewable energy activists could only shout into the air. But a group of investors hatched a plan.

Between November 2011 and December 2013, 22 different companies sued
Spain in seven different cases over the subsidy changes – not in Spanish
courts, but using ISDS.

RREEF, an investment fund subsidiary of Germany’s Deutsche Bank, and Antin,
a private equity firm owned by French bank BNP Paribas, purchased their
Spanish solar-thermal power plants in 2011, three years after
the country began to roll back subsidies. But when they went to ISDS,
they claimed they had expected subsidies to continue — not to continue
declining.

“It feels like they acquired [the solar plants] in order to sue,”
said Lora Verheecke, a campaigner for Corporate Europe Observatory, a
Brussels-based research organization. Those two cases are still pending;
a tribunal order allowed the RREEF case to advance in June.

Could Italian mayors follow in the footsteps of their French
counterparts and issue decrees outlawing the burkini? In order to answer
this question, we would need to discuss the meaning that the principle
of secularism has in each of these two countries.

In France, the heir and guardian of the Enlightenment, the secularism of
the republic is defended in the first article of the constitution.
Secularism here is interpreted as the absolute neutrality of government
institutions in the face of religious phenomena, which are considered to
be potential factors for social divisions. The state must guarantee
freedom of religion, without interference. Meanwhile, religion must
remain a “private affair,” devoid of any social or legal emphasis. In
other words, secularism in France is based on the clear separation of
church and state. Citizens may be Jews, Muslims and Christians in the
confines of their own homes, but French republicans once they step out
the front door.

As a result, students in French state schools (excluding universities)
are not allowed to wear clothes or symbols that “conspicuously manifest
religious affiliation,” including the veil. Students may be suspended or
expelled if they do so, under French law no. 228/200.

Similarly, “identity concealment by the covering of the face in public
spaces” is prohibited in France, under law no. 1192/2010 — effectively
banning the burqa and niqab. The European Court of Human Rights upheld
the ban on wearing full-face veils in public on two occasions.

In Italy, however, the secular state is understood in a positive and
inclusive sense. The Italian constitution regards religious phenomena as
articles for personal expression that can exist in private and in
public.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/salvatore-curreri/banning-the-burkini-in-it_b_11610376.html

https://kyberia.sk/id/8204646

medved,priroda,eko,ochrana

Valí sa dnes na nás vlna migrantov? NE. – Vynikajúca aplikácia Českého
rozhlasu – každý deň si môžete pozrieť, koľko dnes zadržala Česká
polícia nelegálnych migrantov, a porovnať to s počtom trestných činov.

Nelegální migranti. Už jsou tady?
Ne.

Včera Policie ČR zadržela 0 migrantů.

Také každý den dopadne průměrně 11 lidí za výrobu, držení a distribuci drog.

Pachatelů loupežných přepadení zatkne každý den 6.

Také se ukradne 20 automobilů.
http://www.rozhlas.cz/zpravy/data/_zprava/kolik-migrantu-zadrzela-v-uplynulem-tydnu-policie-zjistite-z-grafu-ktery-se-kazdy-den-aktualizuje–1560340

tags:socializmus,komunizmus,rusko,okupacia,totalita,blog

Film, v ktorom ruská propaganda mení históriu a historické fakty
udalostí z roku 1968. Dokument odvysielaný v ruskej štátnej TV Rossija 1
chcela zakúpiť aj česká TV. Rusi odmietli predať autorské práva – táto
lož bola určená vyhradne pre ruských občanov. (aj s titulkami)

Jozef Ridzoň

Povinné pozrieť si toto video pre každého komu záleží na Slovensku a slobode. Aby sme vedeli čo čakať z Ruska.
Aktuálny dokument ruskej verejnoprávnej televízie o r. 1968 so slovenskými titulkami.

– Muslims marched in the French town of Mantes-la-Jolie on Sunday to
protest the recent killing of a local police chief and his wife by a man
who had sworn allegiance to the Islamic State group. Between 2,500 to
5,000 people took part in the solemn procession 50km west of Paris,
which was organised by local mosques and Muslim groups.
http://www.france24.com/en/20160620-france-muslims-march-against-terrorism-magnanville-police-murder

– At least 3.7 million people, including world leaders, marched in anti-terrorism rallies in Paris and elsewhere in France.

NB: Toto bol mix ľudí z celého Francúzska, medzi nimi bolo však veľa
moslimov, vrátane klerikov, hláv veľkých francúzskych mešít etc. V tom
čase airovala aj silná kampaň #notinmyname, kde sa tisíce moslimov
online aj v uliciach vymedzovali proti terorizmu
http://edition.cnn.com/2015/01/11/world/charlie-hebdo-paris-march/

– Italian Muslims braved pouring rain to distance themselves from
Islamist militants in rallies in Rome and other cities on Saturday.
http://in.reuters.com/article/italy-muslims-march-idINKCN0TB02820151122

– Zhruba dvě stě lidí odsoudilo ve středu večer na pražském náměstí
Jiřího z Poděbrad teroristické útoky páchané ve jménu islámu. Akci,
která začala katolickou bohoslužbou, zorganizovali čeští muslimové. V
závěru účastníci vytvořili kolem kostela lidský řetěz.

NB: podla odhadov zije v CR okolo 11k moslimov.
http://zpravy.idnes.cz/muslimove-proti-terorismu-demonstrace-fc4-/domaci.aspx?c=A160810_100043_domaci_zt

A to je len zopár eventov, ktoré si pamätám. Nedávno protesty prebehli aj v Londýne, v US boli na viacerych miestach atd.

Avšak, nechápem tú požiadavku, aby sa vymedzovali a niečo „nám“ tak
dokazovali. Neviem, či sa považuješ za kresťana, ale prišlo by ti
normálne ak by si sa mal vymedzovať voči činom iných kresťanov kade tade
po svete?
Mal by si potrebu ísť protestovať a písať na internety Not In My Name,
po nedávnych útokoch kresťanských teroristov na abortion clinics v US?
Alebo po tom, čo svet obletelo video ako kresťanskí teroristi masovo
vraždia moslimov v Central African Republic? (viac info).
Chodil by si snáď protestovať proti The Lord’s Resistance Army alebo
The Christian Identity Movement? Vieš vôbec, že existujú, páchali a
stále páchajú brutálne násilie v mene kresťanstva?

https://kyberia.sk/id/8200099

zdravotnictvo,poistovne,vszp,penta,platby poistovni,lekar,nemocnica,poliklinika,sukromne,statne

kyberia diskusia, povodny prispevok https://kyberia.sk/id/8196530

glukoza,cukrovka,tehotenstvo,zahumensky,yossa

cisarsky porod,zahumensky,sekcia

https://kyberia.sk/id/8195700
..facts (climate change) vs. values judgments (good to stop the climate
change) vs. politics (who pays the bill for stopping the climate
change).

I’d like to suggest a thought experiment here, to show just how the
costs and benefits offered by the climate change movement stacked up.
Let’s imagine, for a moment, that there’s an industry in today’s
industrial nations that churns out colossal amounts of greenhouse gases
every single day. It doesn’t produce anything necessary for human life
or well-being; it’s simply a convenience, and one that, not that many
decades ago, most people in the industrial world did without and never
thought they’d need. If it were to be shut down, sure, a certain number
of people would lose their jobs, but most of the steps that have been
urged by climate change activists would have that effect; other than
that, and a certain amount of inconvenience for its current users, the
only result would be a sharp decrease in the amount of carbon dioxide
and certain other greenhouse gases being dumped into the atmosphere.
That being the case, shouldn’t climate change activists get to work
right now to shut down that industry, and shouldn’t they start off by
boycotting it themselves?

The industry in question actually exists. It’s the commercial air travel industry.
You may have noticed, dear reader, that nobody in the climate change
movement has been out there protesting commercial air travel, and
precious few of them are even willing to cut back on their flying time,
even though commercial air travel a massive contributor to the problems
the movement claims to be fighting. I know of two scientists researching
climate change who have pointed out that there’s something just a
little bit hypocritical about flying all over the world on jetliners to
attend conferences discussing how we all have to decrease our carbon
footprint! Their colleagues, needless to say, haven’t listened. Neither
has the rest of the climate change movement; like Al Gore, who might as
well be their poster child, they keep on racking up their frequent flyer
miles.

On the other hand, climate change activists are eager to shut down coal
mining. What’s the most significant difference between coal mining and
commercial air travel? Coal mining provides wages for the working poor;
commercial air travel provides amenities for the affluent.

Slovensko okolo roku 2000, vstupovanie do EU

utecenci,nemecko,integracia

vrm,trencin,black hawk,simulator

truth,illusion,cognitive ease,politics,adverts,marketing,learning,psychology

turecko,prevrat,puc,Erdoğan,Erdogan,Gulen